Maslow Need and
Alderfer’s ERG Theory
A Brief Comparison
A Brief Comparison
To bring
Maslow’s want hierarchy theory of motivation in synchronization with inquiry,
Cl ayton Alderfer redefined it in his own terms.
His redefined work is named as ERG theory of
motivation. He recategorized Maslow’s hierarch y of wants into 3 easier and
bro ader categories of needs:
• Existence
wants- These embrace need for basic material wants. In short, it includes
AN individual’s physiological and physical safety wants.
• Relatedness
needs- These embrace th e aspiration individual’s have for maintaining vital
social relationships (be it with family, peers or superiors), obtaining public
fame and recognition. Maslow’s social wants and external part of esteem wants
fall into this category of want.
• Growth
wants- These embrace need fo r self-development and private growth and
advancement. Maslow’s self-actualization wants and intrinsic part of esteem
wants fall into this class of want.
The
significance of the 3 categories of wants might vary for every individual.
Difference between Maslow Need and
Alderfer’s ERG Theory
v ERG Theory
states that at a given purpose of your t ime, quite one want is also
operational.
v ERG Theory
conjointly shows that if the fulfillment of a higher-level want is subdued,
there comes a rise in want for satisfying a lower-level wants.
v In Connection
with Maslow, private remains a t a spe cific want level till that require need is
satisfied.
v Whereas in
s tep with ERG theory, if a higher- level want aggravates, a private might
revert to extend the satisfaction of a lower- level want.
v This is
often referred to as frustration- regressio n facet of work unit theory. For
instance- once growth want aggravates, then a p rivate can be intended to
accomp lish the related want and i f there are a unit problems in accomplishing related
wants, then he can be intended by the existence wants. Thus,
frustration/aggravation may result in regression to a lower-level want.
v Whereas
Maslow’s want hierarchy theory is rigid bec ause it assumes that the
requirements follo w a particular and orderly hierarchy and unless a lower-level
need is happy, a private cannot proceed to the higher-level need.
v ERG Theory of motivation is incredibly
versatile a s he perceived the requirements as a variety instead of perceiving
them as a hierarchy.
v According
to Alderfer, a private will work on growt h wants though his existence or related
wants stay unhappy. Thus, he offers rationalization to the difficulty of
“starving artist”.


